From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connell v. Ellison

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1983
58 N.Y.2d 869 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1983

Decided February 10, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, MICHAEL W. DUSKAS, J.

Charles A. Gardner for appellant.

Case, Leader Ayling for Robert Ellison and another, defendants-respondents.

Sanders D. Heller for Hilbert F. La Pierre, third-party defendant-respondent.

Mahlon T. Clements for Mildred M. MacIntyre, fourth-party defendant-respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 86 A.D.2d 943). This disposition is without prejudice to either party, if so advised, making application to the trial court to obtain a definition of boundaries of the subject premises.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Connell v. Ellison

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1983
58 N.Y.2d 869 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Connell v. Ellison

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN T. CONNELL, Appellant, v. ROBERT ELLISON et al., Defendants and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 10, 1983

Citations

58 N.Y.2d 869 (N.Y. 1983)
460 N.Y.S.2d 528
447 N.E.2d 76

Citing Cases

Wagman v. Village of Catskill

We note that it is well settled that "adverse possession for the requisite period of time not only cuts off…

Ullmark v. The Cobourn Corp.

On the nonparties’ motion, however, the nonparties had the burden of establishing that the Vincents had an…