Summary
declining to find reversible error where ALJ failed to "specifically delineate his reasoning with respect to ... limitations assessed by ... a government consultant who examined plaintiff on only one occasion"
Summary of this case from Grooms v. SaulOpinion
No. 3:07-1080.
February 9, 2009
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report") in the above-styled matter (Doc. No. 29), to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon review, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and supported by the record. The Court therefore ADOPTS the Report in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED, the Defendant's decision is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with the Report.
It is so ORDERED.