From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conlam v. Heritage Kitchens, Ltd.

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Ansonia-Milford at Milford
May 13, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 4332 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Opinion

No. CV91 03 64 43S

May 13, 1992


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: SPECIAL DEFENSE


Conlam, Inc. comes before the court seeking summary judgment as to the defendant's special defense.

The plaintiff manufacturer of counters and cabinets has sued for money damages incurred by the failure of the defendant to pay for goods delivered. The defendant has filed a special defense alleging that the goods did not meet specifications despite the fact that in a discovery answer it admitted that they did.

The motion is denied on narrow procedural grounds because although Practice Book 379 permits summary judgments as to a complaint, counterclaim or cross complaint, there is no coverage within its mantle for special defenses.

If in fact there is some lack of good faith in the defendant's pleading the plaintiff has remedies which may be addressed to that.

FLYNN, J.


Summaries of

Conlam v. Heritage Kitchens, Ltd.

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Ansonia-Milford at Milford
May 13, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 4332 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)
Case details for

Conlam v. Heritage Kitchens, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:CONLAM, INC. v. HERITAGE KITCHENS, LTD., ET AL

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Ansonia-Milford at Milford

Date published: May 13, 1992

Citations

1992 Ct. Sup. 4332 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Citing Cases

Quinones v. New Britain Housing Auth

Practice Book 379 permits summary judgments as to complaints, counterclaims or cross-complaints, but makes no…

Lehman Bros. Bank, FSB v. Bridges

The decisions of the Connecticut Superior Court, including decisions of this court, are almost in unanimous…