Condon v. People

Full title: JULIE A. CONDON, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA,

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 24, 2013

2:13-cv-0673 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2013)

Opinion

JULIE A. CONDON, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, No. 2:13-cv-0673 JAM KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. May 24, 2013

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel or "pro se, " has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and a motion to stay and abey this action, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In her application, petitioner challenges a conviction by the Tuolumne County Superior Court. Tuolumne County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on the pending matters.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis, or her motion to stay and abey this action;

         2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

         3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: