From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Companion Life Insurance Company v. Haislett

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Jul 19, 2010
C/A No.: 3:10-1586-JFA (D.S.C. Jul. 19, 2010)

Opinion

C/A No.: 3:10-1586-JFA.

July 19, 2010


ORDER


According to the complaint, this case concerns the disbursement of proceeds from a group life insurance policy issued by the plaintiff as part of an employee welfare benefit plan governed by ERISA ( 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.). Because this matter involves ERISA, the plan participant must pursue and exhaust plan remedies prior to gaining access to the federal courts. Gayle v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 401 F.3d 222, 226 (4th Cir. 2005). Here, the court is unable to discern from the pleadings filed thus far whether the plan remedies have been pursued and exhausted. The court therefore orders counsel for the plaintiff to advise the court within 10 days of the date of this order whether the administrative remedies have been exhausted and whether this matter is ripe for judicial review.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Companion Life Insurance Company v. Haislett

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Jul 19, 2010
C/A No.: 3:10-1586-JFA (D.S.C. Jul. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Companion Life Insurance Company v. Haislett

Case Details

Full title:Companion Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Maria C. Haislett…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division

Date published: Jul 19, 2010

Citations

C/A No.: 3:10-1586-JFA (D.S.C. Jul. 19, 2010)