From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Woodruff

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 1, 1966
216 A.2d 119 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966)

Opinion

December 17, 1965.

February 1, 1966.

Appeal, No. 561, Oct. T., 1965, from judgment of sentence of Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County, Oct. T., 1962, Nos. 48 and 49. Proceeding following violation of parole by defendant. Argued December 17, 1965.

Neil Leibman, for appellant; Gordon Gelfond, Assistant District Attorney, with him Vincent C. Veldorale and Joseph M. Smith, Assistant District Attorneys, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and James C. Crumlish, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.


Judgment of sentence is affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

FLOOD, J., absent.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Woodruff

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 1, 1966
216 A.2d 119 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Woodruff

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth v. Woodruff, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 1, 1966

Citations

216 A.2d 119 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966)
216 A.2d 119