From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 26, 2021
21 MAL 2021 (Pa. Aug. 26, 2021)

Opinion

21 MAL 2021 22 MAL 2021

08-26-2021

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. CLAYTON STEVE WILSON, Petitioner COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. CLAYTON STEVE WILSON, Petitioner


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2021, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Should the Supreme Court reverse the Superior Court's denial of Petitioner's Petition for Interlocutory Appeal By Permission because said Superior Court's reliance on Mente Chevrolet, Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Swoyer, 710 A.2d 632, 633 (Pa. Super. 1998) is reversibly erroneous . . . in that Mente, supra, is substantially factually distinguishable and substantially legally distinguishable from the case at bar?

These appeals are consolidated for purposes of argument and disposition.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 26, 2021
21 MAL 2021 (Pa. Aug. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. CLAYTON STEVE WILSON…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 26, 2021

Citations

21 MAL 2021 (Pa. Aug. 26, 2021)