From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Triplett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 6, 1976
467 Pa. 510 (Pa. 1976)

Opinion

Submitted January 12, 1976.

Decided July 6, 1976.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, Criminal Section, Philadelphia County, No. 544 June Term, 1972, Matthew W. Bullock, J.

James J. Phelan, Philadelphia, for appellant.

F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Dist. Atty., Steven H. Goldblatt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Div., for appellee.

Before JONES, C. J., and EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


On October 2, 1974, appellant filed an uncounseled petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, Act of January 23, 1966, P.L. 1580, 19 P. S. § 1180-1 et seq., alleging inter alia, that he had involuntarily entered a plea of guilty to a charge of murder in the second degree. In his petition appellant further alleged that he was unable to pay the costs of the proceedings and requested the court to appoint counsel to represent him. On January 7, 1975, the petition was summarily dismissed without appointment of counsel and without a hearing. Appellant has not previously sought post-conviction relief from the judgment of sentence entered pursuant to his guilty plea.

This Court recently held in Commonwealth v. Adams, 465 Pa. 389, 350 A.2d 820 (1976), that:

"Summary disposition of a petition, without appointment of counsel, is permitted only 'when a previous petition involving the same issue or issues has been finally determined adversely to the petitioner and he . . . was represented by counsel in proceedings thereon.' Pa.R.Crim.P. 1504. See Commonwealth v. Smith, 459 Pa. 583, 330 A.2d 851 (1975); Commonwealth v. Haynes, 234 Pa. Super. 556, 340 A.2d 462 (1975).

"Since Adams in his petition, alleged that he was indigent and requested appointment of counsel, the hearing court should have determined if Adams were, in fact, indigent and if so, counsel should have been appointed to assist him."

Commonwealth v. Adams, 465 Pa. 389, 391, 350 A.2d 820, 822 (1976). Because the summary disposition of Triplett's petition without the appointment of counsel is at variance with our decision in Adams, we remand the record to the trial court to determine whether Triplett's request for the appointment of counsel should be granted and to allow any requested amendments to the pending petition.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Triplett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 6, 1976
467 Pa. 510 (Pa. 1976)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Triplett

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Dwight TRIPLETT, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 6, 1976

Citations

467 Pa. 510 (Pa. 1976)
359 A.2d 392

Citing Cases

Com. v. Sinwell

Our Supreme Court has insisted on a strict construction of Rule 1504. See Commonwealth v. Blair, 470 Pa. 598,…

Commonwealth v. Blair

" (Footnote omitted) Id. at 821-22.See also Commonwealth v. Triplett, 467 Pa. 910, 359 A.2d 392 (1976). Since…