From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Tap Pharm. Prods., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jun 16, 2014
J-52A-2014 (Pa. Jun. 16, 2014)

Opinion

J-52A-2014 No. 84 MAP 2011

06-16-2014

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC.; ABBOTT LABORATORIES; ASTRAZENECA PLC; ASTRAZENECA, HOLDINGS, INC.; ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP; ASTRAZENECA LP; BAYER AG; BAYER CORPORATION; SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE; PFIZER, INC.; PHARMACIA CORPORATION; JOHNSON & JOHNSON; ALZA CORPORATION; CENTROCOR, INC.; ETHICON, INC.; JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, L.P.; MCNEIL-PPC, INC.; ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.; ORTHO BIOTECH PRODUCTS; L.P.; ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC; AMGEN, INC.; IMMUNEX CORPORATION; BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY; BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; IMMUNO-U.S., INC.; AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; AVENTIS BEHRING, LLC.; HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION; BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; BEN VENUE LABORATORIES; BEDFORD LABORATORIES; ROXANE LABORATORIES; SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION; WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION; SCHERING SALES CORPORATION; DEY, INC. DONNA A. BOSWELL, ESQ., ANN M. VICKERY, ESQ., AND JOSEPH A. YOUNG, ESQ., Intervenors APPEAL OF: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ALZA CORPORATION, CENTOCOR, INC., ETHICON, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, L.P., MCNEIL-PPC, INC., ORTHO BIOTECH, INC., ORTHO BIOTECH PRODUCTS, L.P., AND ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. (COLLECTIVELY, THE "JOHNSON & JOHNSON DEFENDANTS)


Appeal from the decision of the

Commonwealth Court (Opinion re Post-

Trial Motions of the Commonwealth and

Johnson & Johnson) dated 08-31-2011 at

No. 212 MD 2004.

CONCURRING STATEMENT

MR. JUSTICE BAER

I concur in the Court's order vacating the Commonwealth Court's order and remanding for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. TAP Pharm. Prods. Inc., ___ A.3d. ___ (Pa. ___ ___, 2014)(Baer, J. concurring)(indicating my view that a remand is warranted for further consideration of the case in light of the OAJC's analysis of the rebate issue).

Madame Justice Todd and Mr. Justice McCaffery join this concurring statement.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Tap Pharm. Prods., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jun 16, 2014
J-52A-2014 (Pa. Jun. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Tap Pharm. Prods., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC.; ABBOTT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 16, 2014

Citations

J-52A-2014 (Pa. Jun. 16, 2014)