From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Steel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 19, 2021
52 EM 2021 (Pa. Nov. 19, 2021)

Opinion

52 EM 2021

11-19-2021

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SIKWA STEEL PETITION OF: JUSTIN C. CAPEK, ESQ.


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2021, in consideration of the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Attorney Justin C. Capek should be granted leave to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B) (providing that an attorney may not unilaterally withdraw his or her appearance with respect to a criminal defendant; rather, a court must determine whether leave to withdraw is warranted). In the event the court permits Attorney Capek to withdraw, the court is ORDERED to determine whether Sikwa Steel is entitled to court-appointed counsel for purposes of allocatur review. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 904(C), (F)(2) (specifying that an indigent petitioner is entitled to court-appointed counsel relative to a first PCRA petition; further providing that any such appointment continues through allocatur review).

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is ORDERED to enter its order regarding this remand within 90 days and to notify this Court promptly of its determination.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Steel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 19, 2021
52 EM 2021 (Pa. Nov. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Steel

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SIKWA STEEL PETITION OF: JUSTIN C. CAPEK…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 19, 2021

Citations

52 EM 2021 (Pa. Nov. 19, 2021)