From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Radcliff

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 6, 1984
479 A.2d 1104 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1984)

Opinion

Argued April 5, 1984.

July 6, 1984.

Appeal from the judgment of sentence and order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Criminal Division, No. 1693 of 1980. Before Warren G. Morgan, Judge. The Superior Court, Nos. 222 and 296 Harrisburg 1981.

Lenora M. Smith, for appellant.

Katherene E. Holtzinger, Deputy District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WICKERSHAM, OLSZEWSKI and HOFFMAN, JJ.


Judgment of sentence vacated and case remanded for evidentiary hearing to determine whether defendant waived her Rule 1100 rights, and if so, whether counsel was ineffective in consenting to such waiver. If the lower court finds such waiver invalid or counsel ineffective in consenting thereto, then defendant is to be discharged; otherwise a new trial is to be granted for reasons other than the Rule 1100 violation.

WICKERSHAM, J., filed a dissenting memorandum.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Radcliff

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 6, 1984
479 A.2d 1104 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1984)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Radcliff

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth v. Radcliff, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 6, 1984

Citations

479 A.2d 1104 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1984)
479 A.2d 1104