From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Peters

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 28, 2018
No. J-S28017-18 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jun. 28, 2018)

Opinion

J-S28017-18 No. 1787 MDA 2017

06-28-2018

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MATTHEW JOSEPH PETERS, Appellant


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence, July 29, 2015, in the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Criminal Division at No(s): CP-28-CR-0000586-2014. BEFORE: OLSON, J., KUNSELMAN, J., and MUSMANNO, J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY KUNSELMAN, J.:

Matthew Joseph Peters seeks to appeal, nunc pro tunc, a July 29, 2015 judgment of sentence. The Commonwealth agreed that Peters' trial counsel was ineffective for missing his original, 30-day window to appeal. However, in its 1925(a) Opinion, the PCRA court questioned, sua sponte, its jurisdiction due to the PCRA's time bar. After reinstating Peters' direct appeal, the learned trial judge correctly realized that, because Peters had not filed his PCRA action until 56 days beyond the 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(1) deadline, the PCRA court lacked jurisdiction to reinstate his appellate rights, nunc pro tunc.

Upon consideration of the 1925(a) Opinion, it is

ORDERED that the November 9, 2017 Notice of Appeal is QUASHED.

Appeal quashed. Judgment Entered. /s/_________
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary Date: 6/28/2018


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Peters

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 28, 2018
No. J-S28017-18 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jun. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MATTHEW JOSEPH PETERS, Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 28, 2018

Citations

No. J-S28017-18 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jun. 28, 2018)