From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Odenwalt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 6, 1970
260 A.2d 460 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970)

Opinion

Submitted June 10, 1970.

August 6, 1970.

Indictment charging defendant with statutory rape. Before BROWN, J. Appeal, No. 1079, Oct. T., 1969, from judgment of sentence of Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, March T., 1969, No. 179. Submitted June 10, 1970.

John A. O'Brien, for appellant; James F. Heinly, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.


The record is remanded to the court below with directions to hold a full evidentiary hearing on the circumstances of appellant's failure to file post-trial motions. If the lower court shall find that appellant did knowingly and intelligently waive his right to file post-trial motions, it shall enter an order to that effect. If the court should find that he did not understandingly and intelligently waive his right to file post-trial motions, it shall permit appellant to file such motions nunc pro tunc. If such motions are denied, it shall permit appellant to file an appeal nunc pro tunc from the judgment of sentence. Commonwealth v. Grillo, 208 Pa. Super. 444, 222 A.2d 427 (1966).


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Odenwalt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 6, 1970
260 A.2d 460 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Odenwalt

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth v. Odenwalt, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 6, 1970

Citations

260 A.2d 460 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970)
217 Pa. Super. 763

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Wardell

If after the hearing the lower court determines that appellant did intentionally and intelligently waive his…