Summary
granting review of the issue of whether the Superior Court erred in holding that a handgun that was only partially tucked into a waistband, with the handle visible, was "concealed" for purposes of the Uniform Firearms Act
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. MontgomeryOpinion
No. 481 EAL 2018
03-12-2019
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Did not the Superior Court err, in a published opinion, in holding that a handgun that was only partially tucked into a waistband, with the handle being visible to all, was nonetheless "concealed" for the purposes of the Uniform Firearms Act?