From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Molina

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 14, 2012
51 A.3d 181 (Pa. 2012)

Opinion

2012-08-14

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Michael MOLINA, Respondent.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 605 WAL 2011.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 33 A.3d 51.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of August 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Where neither the United States Supreme Court nor the appellate courts of Pennsylvania have ever recognized a protected constitutional interest in the decision to remain silent in a pre-arrest setting, did the Superior Court err in ruling that the use by the Commonwealth of a non-testifying defendant's pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence of his guilt infringes upon his constitutional right to be free from self-incrimination?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Molina

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 14, 2012
51 A.3d 181 (Pa. 2012)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Molina

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Michael MOLINA, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

51 A.3d 181 (Pa. 2012)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Molina

Alternatively, the dissent opined that it would find any error harmless in light of the evidence presented by…