From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Mattson

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Nov 26, 1976
357 N.E.2d 30 (Mass. App. Ct. 1976)

Opinion

November 26, 1976.

Adam M. Lutynski for the defendant.

Helen M. Doona, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.


The defendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape and has appealed. (G.L.c. 278, §§ 33A-33G.) He assigns as error the denial of his motion for a directed verdict on so much of the indictment as charged intent to rape. There was ample evidence which warranted the submission of the question of intent to the jury. No useful purpose would be served by restating that evidence. There was no error.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Mattson

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Nov 26, 1976
357 N.E.2d 30 (Mass. App. Ct. 1976)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Mattson

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH vs. GLENN A. MATTSON

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Nov 26, 1976

Citations

357 N.E.2d 30 (Mass. App. Ct. 1976)
4 Mass. App. Ct. 856