From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Martz

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 6, 2020
No. 1528 MDA 2018 (Pa. Super. Ct. Mar. 6, 2020)

Opinion

J-S67044-19 No. 1528 MDA 2018

03-06-2020

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DERECK MICHAEL MARTZ Appellant


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered March 9, 2018
In the Court of Common Pleas of Montour County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-47-CR-0000029-2014 BEFORE: OLSON, J., DUBOW, J., and STEVENS, P.J.E. MEMORANDUM BY STEVENS, P.J.E.:

Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

Appellant, Dereck Michael Martz, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered after a jury convicted him of rape of a child, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, statutory sexual assault, aggravated indecent assault, and indecent assault for actions he committed from age 13 to age 17 against a child under 13 years old. For the following reasons, we remand with instructions to the trial court for further action and retain jurisdiction.

On February 27, 2018, the trial court sentenced Appellant to an aggregate sentence of 12 to 50 years' incarceration. Appellant filed a timely post-sentence motion on March 8, 2018. The trial court docket indicates that a hearing on the motion was scheduled for April 13, 2018. On April 13, 2018, the court conducted the hearing, after which it ordered the parties to file briefs on the matters raised within 45 days. At the same hearing, the court also ordered Appellant to register as a lifetime sex offender under Pennsylvania's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9799.10- 9799.42.

With respect to the briefing schedule, the trial court granted the Commonwealth's request for a briefing extension and set a new date of June 12, 2018. The Commonwealth filed its answer to Appellant's post-sentence motion on that date. The trial court docket, however, does not indicate that the court ruled on Appellant's motion and, after the expiration of 120 days, no order was entered denying the motion by operation of law. Appellant filed the instant notice of appeal on July 31, 2018.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order being appealed. See Pa.R.A.P. 903(a); Commonwealth v. Moir , 766 A.2d 1253 (Pa.Super. 2000). If the defendant files a timely post-sentence motion, the notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order deciding the motion. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(A)(2)(a).

A trial court has 120 days to decide a post-sentence motion, and if it fails to decide the motion within that period, the motion is deemed denied by operation of law. When the motion is deemed denied by operation of law, the clerk of courts shall enter an order deeming the motion denied on behalf of the trial court and serve copies on the parties. See Pa.Crim.P. 720(B)(3)(c). The notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order denying the motion by operation of law. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(A)(2)(b).

Thus, "[i]f post-sentencing motions are timely filed ... the judgment of sentence does not become final for purposes of appeal until the trial court disposes of the motion, or the motion is denied by operation of law." Commonwealth v. Borrero , 692 A.2d 158, 159 (Pa.Super. 1997). Further, when the 120-day period afforded to the trial court to rule on a post-sentence motion expires, the judgment of sentence is not final for purposes of appeal until an order denying it by operation of law is entered on the docket; this is because "the entry of an appropriate order is a prerequisite to this court's exercise of jurisdiction." Id. at 160; see also Commonwealth v. Shamberger , 788 A.2d 408, 410 n. 2 (Pa.Super. 2001) (noting that in a criminal action, the judgment of sentence is made final by an order denying post-sentence motions).

Inexplicably, the clerk of courts has never entered an order indicating that Appellant's post-sentence motion was denied by operation of law, as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(B)(3)(c). Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court. The trial court shall order the clerk of courts to comply with the procedure contained in Pa.R.Crim.P 720(B)(3)(c) within 10 days of the date of this decision, and to provide this Court with a copy of the order entered and an updated docket sheet reflecting the entry of this order on the docket. Once this procedural error has been corrected, we will proceed to the merits of Appellant's appeal.

Case remanded. Jurisdiction retained.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Martz

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 6, 2020
No. 1528 MDA 2018 (Pa. Super. Ct. Mar. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Martz

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DERECK MICHAEL MARTZ Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2020

Citations

No. 1528 MDA 2018 (Pa. Super. Ct. Mar. 6, 2020)