applying presumption of regularity where, eight years after plea, defendant challenged plea as having lacked immigration warnings
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Araujo, NoNo. 08-P-52.
November 3, 2008.
Order denying motion to vacate guilty plea affirmed.
applying presumption of regularity where, eight years after plea, defendant challenged plea as having lacked immigration warnings
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Araujo, NoFull title:COMMONWEALTH v. DEAN A. MARK
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Nov 3, 2008
Even if Araujo's motion did not contain the above defects, the presumption of regularity precludes his…