From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Lehman

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jun 25, 2019
215 A.3d 967 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 69 MAL 2019

06-25-2019

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Michael A. LEHMAN, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue as stated by petitioner is:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred as a matter of law by holding that the costs relating to contested expert testimony in a contested resentencing do not constitute costs of prosecution under 16 P.S. § 1403,[ ]* and are ineligible for imposition upon a defendant reimbursement as part of a sentence as a matter of law rather than the sentencing court's discretion[?]


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Lehman

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jun 25, 2019
215 A.3d 967 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Lehman

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. MICHAEL A. LEHMAN, Respondent

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 25, 2019

Citations

215 A.3d 967 (Pa. 2019)

Citing Cases

Com. v. White

Our Supreme Court has accepted Lehman for review, limited to the question of whether charging the cost of…

Commonwealth v. Lehman

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred as a matter of law by holding that the costs relating to…