From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Harris

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 9, 2016
No. 1848 MDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. May. 9, 2016)

Opinion

J-S39027-16 No. 1848 MDA 2015

05-09-2016

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. DARNELL D. HARRIS, Appellant


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

Appeal from the Order Entered September 22, 2015 in the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County
Criminal Division at No.: CP-41-SA-0000028-2015 BEFORE: STABILE, J., PLATT, J., and STRASSBURGER, J.* JUDGMENT ORDER BY PLATT, J.:

Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

Appellant, Darnell D. Harris, appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his traffic citation for driving a commercial motor vehicle while his operating privilege is suspended at docket number SA-28-2015. We dismiss this appeal as moot.

The relevant procedural background of this case is as follows. On September 22, 2015, Appellant entered a guilty plea, at separate docket number SA-34-2015, to charges of speeding at a hazardous grade and driving a commercial motor vehicle while his operating privilege is suspended. In exchange, the Commonwealth withdrew a second charge of driving a commercial motor vehicle while his operating privilege is suspended, at the instant docket number, SA-28-2015. ( See N.T. Summary Appeal, 9/22/15, at 2-4). On that same date, the court entered an order dismissing the citation at SA-28-2015. ( See Order, 9/22/15, at 1). On October 22, 2015, Appellant filed a notice of appeal at SA-28-2015 only. ( See Trial Court Opinion, 12/24/15, at 1).

The court re-imposed the fines and sanctions imposed by the magisterial district court judge on the charges at SA-34-2015.

On appeal, Appellant challenges the validity of the guilty plea he entered at SA-34-2015. ( See Appellant's Brief, at 1). However, the trial court concluded that because the citation at the docket under which the appeal was filed, SA-28-2015, was dismissed, there are no issues properly before this Court. ( See Trial Ct. Op., at 1). We agree with the trial court.

"Generally, a case will be dismissed if at any stage of the judicial process it is rendered moot." Commonwealth v. Sloan , 907 A.2d 460, 465 (Pa. 2006) (citation omitted). Here, the trial court dismissed the citation at SA-28-2015; it imposed no penalty in this case. Because there is no meaningful relief that can be granted, we must dismiss this appeal as moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot. Judgment Entered. /s/_________
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary Date: 5/9/2016


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Harris

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 9, 2016
No. 1848 MDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. May. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. DARNELL D. HARRIS, Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 9, 2016

Citations

No. 1848 MDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. May. 9, 2016)