From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Grandberry

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 12, 2016
No. J-S50013-16 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jul. 12, 2016)

Opinion

J-S50013-16 No. 2104 MDA 2015

07-12-2016

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ALVIN E. GRANDBERRY, III Appellant


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

Appeal from the Order Entered November 9, 2015 in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-22-CR-0004931-2011 BEFORE: MUNDY, STABILE, and FITZGERALD, JJ. JUDGMENT ORDER BY FITZGERALD, J.:

Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

Appellant, Alvin E. Grandberry, III, appeals from the order of the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus for raising the same claims previously presented in his untimely, first Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546, petition. Appellant again asserts his sentence, which became final on August 13, 2012, was unconstitutional in light of Alleyne v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013), and its Pennsylvania progeny.

The dismissal of Appellant's first PCRA petition was affirmed by this Court in Commonwealth v. Grandberry , 2092 MDA 2014 (Pa. Super. June 30, 2015) (unpublished memorandum).

Following our review, we agree with the PCRA court that no relief is due. We add: (1) the PCRA subsumes the writ of habeas corpus; (2) claims asserting illegal or unconstitutional applications of mandatory minimum sentences are cognizable under the PCRA; (3) Appellant's petition is properly viewed as a second PCRA petition; and (4) because instant petition did not raise any claims that it was timely filed under the PCRA and Appellant's judgment of sentence became final before Alleyne was decided on June 17, 2013, Appellant did not qualify for relief under Ruiz.

See Commonwealth v. Hackett , 956 A.2d 978, 985 (Pa. 2008).

See Commonwealth v. Ruiz , 131 A.3d 54, 60 (Pa. Super. 2015).

See Hackett , 956 A.2d at 985; Ruiz , 131 A.3d at 60.

Ruiz , 131 A.3d at 60 (holding PCRA petitioner may be entitled to relief where his petition is timely filed and his judgment of sentence had not yet become final).

Order affirmed. Judgment Entered. /s/_________
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary Date: 7/12/2016


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Grandberry

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 12, 2016
No. J-S50013-16 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jul. 12, 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Grandberry

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ALVIN E. GRANDBERRY, III Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 12, 2016

Citations

No. J-S50013-16 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jul. 12, 2016)