reversing convictions of defendants and holding that trial court erred by allowing the Commonwealth to present evidence of a 1:1 conversion ratio without expert testimony and by preventing the defendants from presenting expert testimony
Summary of this case from Boslet v. RichmondNO. 1041 MDA 2013
2014-08-26
Com. v. T. Emigh, Jr.
Appeal From: CP–14–CR–0000954–2012 (Centre)
Disposition: Reversed and
Remanded.
reversing convictions of defendants and holding that trial court erred by allowing the Commonwealth to present evidence of a 1:1 conversion ratio without expert testimony and by preventing the defendants from presenting expert testimony
Summary of this case from Boslet v. RichmondFull title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. TIMOTHY A. EMIGH, JR. Appellant…
Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Date published: Aug 26, 2014
Those cases have continued to recognize that '"[t]he general rule for alcohol related DUIs is that only tests…