From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Coit

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 28, 2018
No. 2979 EDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. Aug. 28, 2018)

Opinion

J-S53033-18 No. 2979 EDA 2017

08-28-2018

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. KEVIN COIT Appellant


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

Appeal from the PCRA Order August 11, 2017
In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0001938-2012, CP-51-CR-0012646-2011 BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., OTT, J., and PLATT, J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY GANTMAN, P.J.:

Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

Appellant, Kevin Coit, appeals from the order entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his first petition filed under the Post Conviction Relief Act at 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. Preliminarily, counsel has filed a "no-merit" letter/brief and a petition to withdraw as counsel, pursuant to Commonwealth v. Turner , 518 Pa. 491, 544 A.2d 927 (1988); Commonwealth v. Finley , 550 A.2d 213 (1988). Before counsel can withdraw representation under the PCRA, the law requires counsel to satisfy the mandates of Turner/Finley. Commonwealth v. Karanicolas , 836 A.2d 940, 947 (Pa.Super. 2003).

...Turner/Finley counsel must review the case zealously. Turner/Finley counsel must then submit a "no-merit" letter to the trial court, or brief on appeal to this Court, detailing the nature and extent of counsel's diligent review of the case, listing the issues which the petitioner wants to
have reviewed, explaining why and how those issues lack merit, and requesting permission to withdraw.
Commonwealth v. Wrecks , 931 A.2d 717, 721 (Pa.Super. 2007). Withdrawal as counsel in this context also includes certain notice requirements: Counsel must contemporaneously serve on Appellant copies of the "no-merit" letter or brief, the petition to withdraw, and a letter with a statement advising Appellant that he has the immediate right to file a brief in this Court pro se or with new privately-retained counsel within 30 days. Commonwealth v. Muzzy , 141 A.3d 509 (Pa.Super. 2016). If counsel fails to satisfy the technical prerequisites of Turner/Finley , we generally deny withdrawal and remand for counsel to take the appropriate steps to comply with the Turner/Finley requirements or file an advocate's brief, depending on the case circumstances. Id. To withdraw, counsel must assure this Court of counsel's compliance with these technical requirements. Id.

Instantly, counsel's petition to withdraw states he has made a conscientious examination of the record in this case and determined the appeal is totally frivolous, because Appellant is "no longer serving a sentence" (this last statement is completely inaccurate and inconsistent with record as well as the briefs filed on appeal and must be corrected). In the withdrawal petition, counsel also states he served the Commonwealth and Appellant with a copy of the Turner/Finley Letter Brief and advised Appellant of his rights. Other than counsel's statement, however, nothing in the Letter Brief, petition to withdraw, or certified record confirms that counsel contemporaneously served Appellant with copies of the Letter Brief and the petition to withdraw. Instead, the proofs of service attached to counsel's filings indicate service on the Commonwealth only. Further, no copy of the letter showing service to Appellant and advising him of his rights is attached to the withdrawal petition. Thus, counsel's petition to withdraw contains a mistake regarding the case, and it does not comply with the Turner/Finley notice requirements.

The practice of attaching to the withdrawal petition a copy of counsel's letter to Appellant ensures proper notification and relieves this Court of having to assume counsel's rightful burden. See Commonwealth v. Millisock , 873 A.2d 748, 752 (Pa.Super. 2005).

Accordingly, we deny counsel's petition to withdraw and direct counsel to: (a) file an amended petition to withdraw as counsel in this Court, within ten days of the filing date of this decision; (b) send a copy of the Letter Brief and amended withdrawal petition to Appellant with an amended certificate demonstrating proper service of the Letter Brief and amended withdrawal petition on Appellant and the Commonwealth; and (c) attach to the amended withdrawal petition a copy of the cover letter sent to Appellant, advising him of his immediate right, pro se or with privately retained counsel, to file, within 30 days, a brief on points Appellant deems worthy of review. See Muzzy , supra.

Petition to withdraw as counsel denied; case remanded with instructions. Panel jurisdiction is retained. Judgment Entered. /s/_________
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary Date: 8/28/18


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Coit

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 28, 2018
No. 2979 EDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. Aug. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Coit

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. KEVIN COIT Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 28, 2018

Citations

No. 2979 EDA 2017 (Pa. Super. Ct. Aug. 28, 2018)