From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Brozenick

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Jan 5, 2021
243 A.3d 968 (Pa. 2021)

Opinion

No. 225 WAL 2020

01-05-2021

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Robert Paul BROZENICK, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court misinterpreted this Honorable Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Tharp, 525 Pa. 94, 575 A.2d 557 (1990), and, therefore, erred in concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mr. Brozenick's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, and allowing the Commonwealth to reopen the record where the Commonwealth manifestly failed to present sufficient evidence in its case-in-chief to sustain three counts of Simple Assault and three counts of Terroristic Threats?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Brozenick

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Jan 5, 2021
243 A.3d 968 (Pa. 2021)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Brozenick

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. ROBERT PAUL BROZENICK…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 5, 2021

Citations

243 A.3d 968 (Pa. 2021)