From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Bricker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 3, 2018
177 A.3d 823 (Pa. 2018)

Opinion

No. 5 WAL 2016

01-03-2018

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. David BRICKER, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the sentencing court impose a harsh, severe, and manifestly unreasonable and excessive sentence in light of the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident?

The judgment of sentence is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, ___ Pa. ___, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Bricker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 3, 2018
177 A.3d 823 (Pa. 2018)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Bricker

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. David BRICKER, Petitioner

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

177 A.3d 823 (Pa. 2018)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Bricker

Commonwealth v. Bricker, 135 A.3d 669 (Pa. Super. 2015). Appellant timely filed a petition for allowance of…