From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Berryhill

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Oct 10, 2018
194 A.3d 1045 (Pa. 2018)

Opinion

4 EAP 2018

10-10-2018

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Shakir BERRYHILL, Appellant

Karl Baker, Esq., Defender Association of Philadelphia, Keir Nyree Barros-Bradford, Esq., Shonda H. Williams, Esq., for Appellant. Lawrence Jonathan Goode, Esq., Jonathan Michael Levy, Esq., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, for Appellee.


Karl Baker, Esq., Defender Association of Philadelphia, Keir Nyree Barros-Bradford, Esq., Shonda H. Williams, Esq., for Appellant.

Lawrence Jonathan Goode, Esq., Jonathan Michael Levy, Esq., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, for Appellee.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2018, this appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Berryhill

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Oct 10, 2018
194 A.3d 1045 (Pa. 2018)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. SHAKIR BERRYHILL, Appellant

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 10, 2018

Citations

194 A.3d 1045 (Pa. 2018)