From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Bachner

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 14, 2020
240 A.3d 925 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

Summary

In Bachner, the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction for unsworn falsification to authorities in connection with his completing the federal and state applications to purchase a firearm.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Bennett

Opinion

No. 414 WDA 2018

09-14-2020

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Ronald Charles BACHNER, Appellant


Non-Precedential Decision

See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing

Reversed. Vacated.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Bachner

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 14, 2020
240 A.3d 925 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

In Bachner, the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction for unsworn falsification to authorities in connection with his completing the federal and state applications to purchase a firearm.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Bennett
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Bachner

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RONALD CHARLES BACHNER Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 14, 2020

Citations

240 A.3d 925 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Bennett

He further claims that the evidence was insufficient because it equally supported a finding that he was…