Summary
granting allocatur to address, inter alia, whether the Superior Court's "enumerated conditions of admissibility [were] appropriate"
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. A.R.Opinion
No. 269 MAL 2010.
2012-07-26
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. A.R., Petitioner.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 269 MAL 2010.
Prior report: Pa.Super., 990 A.2d 1.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Superior Court err in affirming the admission of the results of the therapeutic polygraph at the violation of probation hearing? Were the enumerated conditions of admissibility appropriate?