From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bancitaly

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 16, 1941
121 F.2d 452 (9th Cir. 1941)

Opinion

No. 9841.

June 16, 1941.

Upon Petitions to Review a Decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J.P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., for Commissioner.

George H. Koster, of San Francisco, Cal., Charles D. Hamel, of Washington, D.C., Monroe Goldwater, of New York City, and John Enrietto, of Washington, D.C., for Bancitaly Corporation.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.


Upon consideration of the joint motion of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petitions to review herein be dismissed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court issued forthwith.


Summaries of

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bancitaly

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 16, 1941
121 F.2d 452 (9th Cir. 1941)
Case details for

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bancitaly

Case Details

Full title:COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. BANCITALY CORPORATION…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 16, 1941

Citations

121 F.2d 452 (9th Cir. 1941)

Citing Cases

Branum v. Campbell

The purchase price was paid in full, and the contract of April 1, 1948, specifically provided that title to…