From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commission v. Barclays Bank Plc

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 2, 2015
2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)

Opinion

          THOMAS J. NOLAN, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Los Angeles, California, STEVEN R. GLASER, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, New York, New York, PATRICK FITZGERALD, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Chicago, Illinois, JOHN N. ESTES III, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), DONNA M. BYRNE, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Washington, D.C., GREGORY A. MARKEL, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLP, New York, New York, PAUL J. PANTANO JR., (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), JODI L. AVERGUN, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLP, Washington, D.C., SETH P. WAXMAN, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), DAN M. BERKOVITZ, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), JONATHAN G. CEDARBAUM, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), HEATHER M. ZACHARY, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP, Washington, D.C., MARK C. KALPIN, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, Attorneys for Defendant BARCLAYS BANK PLC.

          LESLIE M. WERLIN, McGUIREWOODS LLP, Los Angeles, California, TODD MULLINS, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), McGUIREWOODS LLP, Washington, D.C., ALLISON D. CHARNEY, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), McGUIREWOODS LLP, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants DANIEL BRIN and SCOTT CONNELLY.

          MICHAEL L. SPAFFORD, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), VICTORIA L. TAYLOR, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), J. BUB WINDLE, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), PAUL HASTINGS LLP, Washington, D.C., Attorneys for Defendants KAREN LEVINE and RYAN SMITH.

          DAVID A. APPLEBAUM, WESLEY J. HEATH, EMILY C. SCRUGGS, MARIA CRISTINA MELENDEZ, Office of Enforcement, Washington, D.C., Attorneys for FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION.


          JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REDACTION OF PERSONAL ADDRESSES AND ZIP CODES

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         JOINT STIPULATION

         The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"), on the one hand, and Barclays Bank PLC, Daniel Brin, Scott Connelly, Karen Levine, and Ryan Smith (collectively, "Defendants" and, with FERC, the "Parties"), on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

         1. With respect to the filing to be made by FERC on November 2, 2015, pursuant to this Court's October 2, 2015 Scheduling Order (Dkt. 106), personal addresses and zip codes, although not required by rule, will be redacted.

         2. Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that the Court approve this stipulation and enter the proposed order.

          ORDER

         Pursuant to the foregoing joint stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall redact personal addresses and zip codes included in the materials that it will file on November 2, 2015, pursuant to the Court's October 2, 2015 Scheduling Order.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Commission v. Barclays Bank Plc

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 2, 2015
2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Commission v. Barclays Bank Plc

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. BARCLAYS BANK PLC…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 2, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)