From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comminey v. Gonzalez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 6, 2010
ED CV 10-01111 MMM (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2010)

Opinion


WALTER COMMINEY, Petitioner, v. F. GONZALEZ, WARDEN, Respondent. No. ED CV 10-01111 MMM (RZ). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 6, 2010.

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner filed no timely objections to the Report. He filed tardy objections on September 15, 2010. The Court has considered those objections and has reviewed de novo the portions of the record noted in the objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.


Summaries of

Comminey v. Gonzalez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 6, 2010
ED CV 10-01111 MMM (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Comminey v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:WALTER COMMINEY, Petitioner, v. F. GONZALEZ, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 6, 2010

Citations

ED CV 10-01111 MMM (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2010)