From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commercial, c., Co. v. Southern Surety Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
101 N.J. Eq. 738 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Decided October 17th, 1927.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 100 N.J. Eq. 92.

Messrs. McCarter English, for the respondent.

Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn Colyer, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Commercial, c., Co. v. Southern Surety Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
101 N.J. Eq. 738 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

Commercial, c., Co. v. Southern Surety Co.

Case Details

Full title:COMMERCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent, v. SOUTHERN SURETY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1927

Citations

101 N.J. Eq. 738 (N.J. 1927)
138 A. 919

Citing Cases

Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Stern

Another situation which will lead to the exercise of jurisdiction by this court,—at least to the extent of…

Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

The law courts of New Jersey recognize fraud only where the falsity was uttered knowingly and intentionally.…