Opinion
April 23, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.).
"[C]ourts do not possess the power to dismiss an action for general delay where plaintiff has not been served with a 90-day demand to serve and file a note of issue pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b)" ( Chase v. Scavuzzo, 87 N.Y.2d 228, 233). Here, the only 90-day demand that defendants ever made was in May 1990, which demand was tolled and effectively withdrawn by the stipulation dated November 17, 1990. There was, as a result, no operative demand in March 1997, when defendants renewed their motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216. Consequently, the IAS court properly denied the motion to dismiss.
Concur — Lerner, P.J., Nardelli, Wallach, Williams and Saxe, JJ.