From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Combier v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2008
57 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4747

December 4, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered October 3, 2007, which denied plaintiffs motion to compel disclosure and granted defendants' cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Gregory S. Chiarello of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Dana Poole of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.


Even were the complaint construed to be a CPLR article 78 petition alleging refusal to furnish requested Parents Association financial records in violation of New York City Department of Education, Chancellor's Regulation A-660, it would have to be dismissed for failure to exhaust the grievance procedures set forth in the pertinent regulation ( see Villalba v New York City Dept. of Educ., 50 AD3d 279).


Summaries of

Combier v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2008
57 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Combier v. City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:BETSY COMBIER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 4, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9485
867 N.Y.S.2d 680

Citing Cases

Acevedo v. Fire Dep't

Petitioner thus has exhausted the available administrative review so as to seek judicial review of both…

Acevedo v. Fire Dep't

Petitioner thus has exhausted the available administrative review so as to seek judicial review of both…