From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 3, 1977
373 A.2d 1087 (Pa. 1977)

Opinion

Submitted April 12, 1977.

Decided June 3, 1977.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Trial Division, Criminal Section, as of January Sessions, 1975, Nos. 403 and 406, Gregory G. Lagakos, J.

Bruce W. Miller, Hazleton, for appellant.

F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Dist. Atty., Steven H. Goldblatt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Div., Gaele Barthold, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.


OPINION


Appellant was found guilty by a jury of voluntary manslaughter and simple assault. The conviction arose out of the shooting death of one individual and the wounding of another. In this appeal, appellant asserts the trial court erred in (1) refusing to charge the jury on involuntary manslaughter; (2) refusing to grant a mistrial after allegedly improper prosecutorial remarks made during closing argument; and (3) prohibiting the defense from introducing certain evidence at trial. Appellant failed to preserve these claims for appellate review, however, as he did not raise them in written post-verdict motions. See Commonwealth v. Blair, 460 Pa. 31, 331 A.2d 213 (1975). Therefore, judgment of sentence must be affirmed.


Summaries of

Com. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 3, 1977
373 A.2d 1087 (Pa. 1977)
Case details for

Com. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Zachary WILLIAMS, Appellant (two cases)

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 3, 1977

Citations

373 A.2d 1087 (Pa. 1977)
373 A.2d 1087

Citing Cases

Com. v. Kesting

This allegation, however, was not presented to the court below in written post-verdict motions, was not brief…