From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Grahame

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 18, 2009
981 A.2d 1284 (Pa. 2009)

Opinion

No. 250 EAL 2008.

September 18, 2009.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 250 EAL 2008 from the Order of the Superior Court.

Prior Report: Pa.Super., 947 A.2d 762.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue below. In all other respects the Petition is DENIED.

The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in finding sufficient reasonable suspicion based on a "guns follow drugs" presumption to justify a "protective search" of Petitioner's pocketbook for weapons pursuant to Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)?

In addressing this issue, the parties are to discuss and address any alternative, intermediate investigative measures, short of a search, which police officers may have lawfully utilized under the circumstances of this case. See, e.g., 4 Wayne R. Lafave, Search and Seizure § 9.6(e) (4th. Ed. 2008).


Summaries of

Com. v. Grahame

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 18, 2009
981 A.2d 1284 (Pa. 2009)
Case details for

Com. v. Grahame

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Lekeyia GRAHAME, Petitioner

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 18, 2009

Citations

981 A.2d 1284 (Pa. 2009)
981 A.2d 1284