From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Clark

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 6, 1977
378 A.2d 386 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1977)

Opinion

Argued December 9, 1976.

Decided October 6, 1977.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Trial Division, Criminal Section, Imposed on Nos. 844 and 845, April Sessions, 1975; Sabo, Judge.

Morton Krase, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Deborah E. Glass and Steven H. Goldblatt, Assistant District Attorneys, Philadelphia, submitted a brief for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WATKINS, President Judge, and JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.


Appellant contends that the lower court erred in refusing to read his requested instruction on the issue of alibi. Appellant's co-defendant raised an identical claim in Commonwealth v. Van Wright, 249 Pa. Super. 451, 378 A.2d 382 (1977), in which we reversed the judgment of sentence and granted the co-defendant a new trial. Therefore, for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Van Wright, we reverse appellant's judgment of sentence and grant a new trial.

Judgment of sentence vacated and new trial granted.

CERCONE, J., concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Com. v. Clark

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 6, 1977
378 A.2d 386 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1977)
Case details for

Com. v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Tommie L. CLARK, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 6, 1977

Citations

378 A.2d 386 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1977)
378 A.2d 386

Citing Cases

Com. v. Van Wright

We reach the same result in that case for the same reasons. See Commonwealth v. Clark, 249 Pa. Super. 459,…