From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. ex rel. Luzzi v. Banmiller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 1960
165 A.2d 124 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1960)

Opinion

September 14, 1960.

November 16, 1960.

Criminal Law — Practice — Habeas corpus — Repetitious petitions.

In this case, it was Held that relator's petition for writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed by the court below as repetitious of prior petitions.

Before RHODES, P.J., GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, ERVIN, WATKINS, and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Appeal, No. 316, Oct. T., 1960, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Oct. T., 1959, No. 3, in case of Commonwealth ex rel. Frank Luzzi v. William Banmiller, Warden. Order affirmed.

Habeas corpus.

Order entered dismissing petition, opinion by HESS, J. Relator appealed.

Frank Luzzi, appellant, in propria persona.

Peter F. Cianci, Assistant District Attorney, with him Frederick O. Brubaker, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.


Submitted September 14, 1960.


Relator's petition for writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed by the court below as repetitious of prior petitions. Relator was convicted in the Court of Oyer and Terminer of Berks County of burglary, larceny, and carrying firearms without a license. He was sentenced to a prison term of not less than seven and a half years and not more than twenty years. No appeal was taken from the judgments of sentence.

Relator has been given unlimited opportunity to attack his convictions. His repetitious contentions are devoid of merit and become merely time consuming in the courts.

We therefore affirm the dismissal of the last petition for writ of habeas corpus on the following portion of the opinion of Judge HESS of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County:

"It is not necessary to consider the allegations of the petition except to say that they are the same allegations which have been considered in previous applications to this court and to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The allegations have been reviewed by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania on two occasions and by the Supreme Court of the United States on application for certiorari. See Luzzi v. Tees, 46 Berks Co. L.J. 229; Commonwealth ex rel. Luzzi v. Tees, 176 Pa. Super. 528 [ 108 A.2d 921]; Commonwealth ex rel. Luzzi v. Ct. of Q.S. and O. T. of Berks County, 179 Pa. Super. 486 [ 118 A.2d 227]; United States of America ex rel. Frank Luzzi v. William Banmiller, Warden, 248 F.2d 303; No. 240 Misc. Frank Luzzi, Petitioner v. William J. Banmiller, Warden, 355 U.S. 924, 2 L.ed. 2d 355, 78 S. Ct. 367. It has been `. . . held repeatedly that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which is repetitious of previous petitions should be dismissed: (citing cases).': Commonwealth ex rel. Huber v. Myers, 187 Pa. Super. 553, 555."

Order is affirmed.


Summaries of

Com. ex rel. Luzzi v. Banmiller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 1960
165 A.2d 124 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1960)
Case details for

Com. ex rel. Luzzi v. Banmiller

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth ex rel. Luzzi, Appellant, v. Banmiller

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 16, 1960

Citations

165 A.2d 124 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1960)
165 A.2d 124

Citing Cases

Com. ex Rel. Norman v. Rundle

The appellate courts of Pennsylvania have repeatedly held that a petition for habeas corpus which is merely…

Com. ex Rel. Dickerson v. Rundle

Further discussion now would tend to be repetitious and serve no useful purpose. Since no issue of fact needs…