From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company v. Fontenot

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 5, 1966
190 So. 2d 234 (La. 1966)

Opinion

No. 48336.

October 5, 1966.

IN RE: COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY APPLYING FOR CERTIORARI, OR WRIT OF REVIEW, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EVANGELINE.


The application is denied. According to the facts of this case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, the result reached by the Court of Appeal is correct.

HAWTHORNE and McCALEB, JJ., concur, being of the opinion that the 1953 agreements provide for the creation of more than one servitude and, therefore, the plea of prescription is well founded.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted to clarify the jurisprudence in this important area of the law.


I would grant this application for writs to clarify the factual and legal basis upon which the opinion of the Court of Appeal is predicated. However, upon the facts available from this application I am of the opinion the result is correct for I view the right to lay additional lines as a separate servitude from the right to lay the first line.


Summaries of

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company v. Fontenot

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 5, 1966
190 So. 2d 234 (La. 1966)
Case details for

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company v. Fontenot

Case Details

Full title:COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY v. PERCY J. FONTENOT

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 5, 1966

Citations

190 So. 2d 234 (La. 1966)
249 La. 717

Citing Cases

Hanks v. Gulf States Utilities Company

Here, our only concern is with the loss by prescription of one of the different modes of use set forth in the…