From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colon v. Lantz

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Feb 23, 2010
CASE NO. 3:08cv38 (RNC) (D. Conn. Feb. 23, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:08cv38 (RNC).

February 23, 2010


RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS


On December 4, 2009, the court granted the plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. On February 17, 2010, pro bono counsel filed an appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's motions (doc. ##91, 96) are denied without prejudice to refiling by counsel.

Upon filing an appearance, plaintiff's counsel filed a motion for extension of time in which to file the Joint Trial Memorandum. (Doc. #102.) The motion is granted. The Joint Trial Memorandum shall be filed by May 17, 2010 in the manner prescribed in the attached addendum. Accordingly, the parties' pending motions for extension of time (doc. # 92, 95, 97) are denied as moot.

SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this 23rd day of February, 2010.

Addendum

On or before May 17, 2010, the parties will jointly prepare and file for approval by the Court a joint trial memorandum. Counsel signing the memorandum must certify that it is the product of consultation between the lawyers who will be trying the case. The memorandum will be in the form prescribed by the District Court's Standing Order Regarding Trial Memoranda in Civil Cases (see Local Rules of Civil Procedure), and must be certified that it is a joint product of consultation between the lawyers trying the case, with the following modifications:

a. Witnesses: Set forth the name and address of each witness to be called at trial. Provide a brief summary of the anticipated testimony of each witness and an estimate of the probable duration of his or her testimony (e.g. less than one hour, two to three hours, one full day). For each expert witness, set forth the opinion to be expressed, a brief summary of the basis of the opinion and a list of the materials on which the witness intends to rely. If a party objects to all or any part of the anticipated testimony of any witness, lay or expert, the objection must be stated in this section of the joint memorandum so that it can be addressed prior to trial.

b. Exhibits : The parties will prepare the list of exhibits required by the Standing Order. The list must specifically identify each exhibit by providing a brief description of the exhibit. The exhibits will be listed in numerical order starting with Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 and Defendants' Exhibit 1. If a party has an objection with regard to a designated exhibit, the objection must be stated in this section of the joint memorandum or it will be waived. Each party will prepare an original set of exhibits, plus a duplicate copy for the Court and every other party, marked with exhibit tags provided by the Clerk. The duplicate sets of exhibits must be submitted to the Court not later than the day before the final pretrial conference. Counsel will retain the original set of exhibits for use at trial.

c. Jury Instructions : In jury cases, the parties will meet and confer for the purpose of preparing and filing tailored jury instructions on the elements of the parties' claims and defenses. The proposed instructions will be submitted as an attachment to the joint trial memorandum. If the parties cannot agree as to the appropriateness of a particular instruction, each party must submit a proposed instruction supported by a brief explanation of its position, including citation to applicable authority.

d. Anticipated Evidentiary Problems : The parties will attach motions in limine with memoranda of law concerning any anticipated evidentiary problems.

e. Verdict Form : In jury cases the parties will submit as an exhibit to the joint trial memorandum a proposed verdict form suitable for submission to a jury. The form may require the jury to return a special verdict with special findings as permitted by Fed.R.Civ.P. 49(a) or a general verdict with or without written interrogatories as permitted by Fed.R.Civ.P. 49(b). If the parties are unable to agree as to the appropriateness of a proposed form, the objecting party must state the basis for the objection and provide an alternative proposal.


Summaries of

Colon v. Lantz

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Feb 23, 2010
CASE NO. 3:08cv38 (RNC) (D. Conn. Feb. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Colon v. Lantz

Case Details

Full title:FELIPE COLON, Plaintiff, v. THERESA LANTZ, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Connecticut

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 3:08cv38 (RNC) (D. Conn. Feb. 23, 2010)