From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colon v. Consolidated Investment Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 7, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV321 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 7, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07CV321.

December 7, 2007


ORDER


The Court has been advised the action has settled. Therefore, it is not necessary the action remain on the calendar of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED this action is closed. It shall be marked settled and dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to (1) vacate this Order and reopen the action upon cause shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary or (2) alter the terms of settlement and dismissal upon agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Colon v. Consolidated Investment Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 7, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV321 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Colon v. Consolidated Investment Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Gricel Colon, Plaintiff, v. Consolidated Investment Corp., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 7, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07CV321 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 7, 2007)