Summary
relying on the words "to result in" in subsection (c) and "to require" and "to provide" in subsection (d)
Summary of this case from Goldman v. Standard Ins. Co.Opinion
B142962
Filed May 31, 2001 REVIEW GRANTED
relying on the words "to result in" in subsection (c) and "to require" and "to provide" in subsection (d)
Summary of this case from Goldman v. Standard Ins. Co.B142962
Filed May 31, 2001 REVIEW GRANTED
relying on the words "to result in" in subsection (c) and "to require" and "to provide" in subsection (d)
Summary of this case from Goldman v. Standard Ins. Co.Full title:FRANCISCO COLMENARES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BRAEMAR COUNTRY CLUB…
Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Date published: May 31, 2001
Id. at 1024 n. 2, 1030-31, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 662, 63 P.3d 220(noting, in construing whether FEHA required a…
Vaughan v. Jacobs & JacobsWhether or not these changes to FEHA apply retroactively is now before our Supreme Court. (Colmenares v.…