From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Veazy

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1932
166 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1932)

Opinion

(Filed 26 October, 1932.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Small, J., at August Term, 1932, of HOKE. Affirmed.

Arthur D. Gore and H. W. B. Whitley for plaintiff.

Lutterloh Lilly for intervener.


This action involves an accounting between the plaintiff, a landlord, and the defendant, his tenant, and the intervener, who claims under an agricultural lien executed by the tenant, and a release by the landlord of his lien upon certain crops.

From judgment on the facts admitted in the pleadings and at the trial, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.


We find no error in the trial of this action. The judgment is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Collins v. Veazy

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1932
166 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1932)
Case details for

Collins v. Veazy

Case Details

Full title:F. T. COLLINS v. J. A. VEAZY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1932

Citations

166 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1932)
203 N.C. 849