From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collier v. Abraham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Sep 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12CV15 (E.D. Va. Sep. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12CV15

09-17-2012

CHARLES M. COLLIER, Plaintiff, v. DIRECTOR ABRAHAM, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on February 10, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed Collier's action. On February 27, 2012, the February 10, 2012 Memorandum Order was returned to the Court by the United States Postal Service. Apparently, Collier has left the Henrico County Jail West, where he was confined when he filed this action. Collier has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Collier's failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting the present action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Collier.

It is so ORDERED.

______________

Robert E. Payne

Senior United States District Judge
Dated: September 17, 2012
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Collier v. Abraham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Sep 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12CV15 (E.D. Va. Sep. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Collier v. Abraham

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES M. COLLIER, Plaintiff, v. DIRECTOR ABRAHAM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Sep 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12CV15 (E.D. Va. Sep. 17, 2012)