From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colletti v. Pereira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2009
61 A.D.3d 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-02312.

April 21, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated January 31, 2008, as, upon reargument and renewal, granted the motion of the defendant William A. Butler, Jr., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Steven Cohn, P.C., Carle Place, N.Y. (Mitchell R. Goldklang of counsel), for appellants.

John P. Humphreys, Melville, N.Y. (Scott W. Driver of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

William A. Butler, Jr., a volunteer emergency medical technician for the LaGrange Fire District, was paged to an accident at 1:40 A.M. on July 25, 2002. He was traveling to the site of the accident in his vehicle, northbound on Route 82, a winding mountain road, at or near the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit, with his emergency vehicle blue strobe light illuminated. Upon emerging from a curve, he saw the plaintiffs' vehicle. Butler pushed down on his brakes, but was unable to come to a complete stop. His car skidded approximately two car lengths and struck the plaintiffs' vehicle in the rear.

The Supreme Court properly determined that Butler established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether Butler acted with "wilful negligence or malfeasance" (General Municipal Law § 205-b; see Tobacco v North Babylon Fire Dept., 251 AD2d 398) or with "reckless disregard for the safety of others" (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 [e]; see Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553, 557; Saarinen v Kerr, 84 NY2d 494; Campbell v City of Elmira, 84 NY2d 505; DiFranco v Essig, 2 AD3d 669; Powell v City of Mount Vernon, 228 AD2d 572).


Summaries of

Colletti v. Pereira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2009
61 A.D.3d 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Colletti v. Pereira

Case Details

Full title:MAUREEN COLLETTI et al., Appellants, v. EILEEN PEREIRA et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 2009

Citations

61 A.D.3d 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3119
876 N.Y.S.2d 716

Citing Cases

Schleger v. Jurcsak

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the…

Quiroz v. Gallery

Here, the defendant relies upon his own deposition testimony to establish that he was on his way to an…