From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coley Fertilizer Co. v. Gold Kist, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 2, 1985
330 S.E.2d 597 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

70015.

DECIDED APRIL 2, 1985.

Action on note. Turner Superior Court. Before Judge Crosby.

Stephen L. Ivie, for appellant.

Bob Reinhardt, R. Kelly Raulerson, for appellee.


The plaintiff filed suit against Gold Kist, Inc., and David Nelson in the Superior Court of Turner County, Georgia. The trial court dismissed the complaint as to Gold Kist for failure to set forth facts establishing venue as to Gold Kist. Although the case remains pending against Nelson in the court below, plaintiff seeks to appeal the order dismissing Gold Kist. Gold Kist has moved to dismiss the appeal because the order appealed from is not a final judgment within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). Held:

The order sought to be appealed is not final within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) because the case remains pending below. Because the procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) have not been followed, the appeal must accordingly be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. McMurray, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.


DECIDED APRIL 2, 1985.


Summaries of

Coley Fertilizer Co. v. Gold Kist, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 2, 1985
330 S.E.2d 597 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Coley Fertilizer Co. v. Gold Kist, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:COLEY FERTILIZER COMPANY, INC. v. GOLD KIST, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 2, 1985

Citations

330 S.E.2d 597 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
330 S.E.2d 597

Citing Cases

Waye v. Continental Special Risks, Inc.

Ware v. Handy Storage, 222 Ga. App. 339 ( 474 SE2d 240) (1996).Coley Fertilizer Co. v. Gold Kist, 174 Ga.…

Underwood v. Dunn

"`The order sought to be appealed is not final within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) because the case…