From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colemill Ent. v. Huddleston

Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Middle Section, at Nashville
Feb 12, 1997
Appeal No. 01-A-01-9605-CH-00218 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 1997)

Opinion

Appeal No. 01-A-01-9605-CH-00218.

February 12, 1997.

Davidson Chancery No. 94-3217-I


ORDER

Both the appellant, Colemill Enterprises, Inc., and the appellee, Joe Huddleston, Commissioner, filed petitions to rehear this court's opinion filed 4 December 1996. Thereafter, this court entered an order giving each of the parties ten days within which to file their answers to the respective petitions to rehear. We have now received the answers to the petitions to rehear from both parties.

This court has reviewed these petitions and finds each of them to be without merit. Therefore, we deny the petitions to rehear at the cost of the respective parties.

Enter this ______ day of February 1997.

__________________________________ SAMUEL L. LEWIS, JUDGE

__________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

__________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE


Summaries of

Colemill Ent. v. Huddleston

Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Middle Section, at Nashville
Feb 12, 1997
Appeal No. 01-A-01-9605-CH-00218 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 1997)
Case details for

Colemill Ent. v. Huddleston

Case Details

Full title:COLEMILL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant v. JOE HUDDLESTON, COMM.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Middle Section, at Nashville

Date published: Feb 12, 1997

Citations

Appeal No. 01-A-01-9605-CH-00218 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 1997)