From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
May 12, 2017
162 A.3d 792 (Del. 2017)

Summary

holding that appellant's argument that the State failed to file a motion to have him declared a habitual offender was an attack on the manner in which his sentence was imposed and subject to Rule 35(b)'s ninety-day time bar

Summary of this case from Brown v. State

Opinion

No. 70, 2017

05-12-2017

Devin L. COLEMAN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.


AFFIRMED.

-------- Notes: 1 The motion to affirm was filed on March 2, 2017, but the record was filed on March 30, 2017.


Summaries of

Coleman v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
May 12, 2017
162 A.3d 792 (Del. 2017)

holding that appellant's argument that the State failed to file a motion to have him declared a habitual offender was an attack on the manner in which his sentence was imposed and subject to Rule 35(b)'s ninety-day time bar

Summary of this case from Brown v. State

holding that motion for correction of illegal sentence based on claims that State failed to file habitual offender motion and Superior Court failed to hold proper habitual offender hearing was an attack on the manner in which the sentence was imposed

Summary of this case from Reed v. State
Case details for

Coleman v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEVIN L. COLEMAN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: May 12, 2017

Citations

162 A.3d 792 (Del. 2017)

Citing Cases

Reed v. State

Brittingham v. State, 705 A.2d at 579. See, e.g., Coleman v. State, 2017 WL 2061469, at *2 (Del. May 12,…

Brown v. State

that a sentence was imposed in an illegal manner is subject to the ninety-day time bar in Superior Court…