From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Spearman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 16, 2023
2:19-cv-0369 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-0369 AC P

05-16-2023

RODNEY V. COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 51. Although incredibly difficult to read, in support of the motion, it appears plaintiff states that his cell was searched in April 2023, which somehow affected his ability to use his typewriter. See generally id. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 51) is GRANTED, and

2. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Spearman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 16, 2023
2:19-cv-0369 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Coleman v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY V. COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 16, 2023

Citations

2:19-cv-0369 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)