Coleman v. Hill

Full title: SAAHDI COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. RICK HILL, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 30, 2015

2:12-cv-2171 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2015)

Opinion

SAAHDI COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-2171 TLN KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. April 30, 2015

ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 24, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 24, 2015 are adopted in full;

2. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23) is granted;

3. This action is dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants Fransham and Hill pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and

4. This action be remanded to the assigned magistrate judge for scheduling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.